Technology / Product direction
Connect architecture decisions to continuity decisions.
SynArch's direction brings the intended system and its transition into one governed planning process. Requirements, decisions, review, and recovery ownership provide the common thread.
Reference workflows
See the planning model in practice.
The architecture walkthrough moves from a project brief through a reference topology, review gate, and example Terraform handoff. The continuity walkthrough uses a synthetic incident, mapping confidence, quarantine, and recovery queue.
These are illustrative demonstrations. They show the proposed review model without deploying cloud resources or connecting to a production EHR. A pilot establishes the outputs, integrations, responsibilities, and acceptance evidence for your environment.
Areas of planned development.
These areas describe the roadmap and potential pilot scope. Availability and timing require agreement; they are not promises of deployed integrations.
AI-assisted architecture
Help assemble reference options, assumptions, and decision records from a modernization brief, with human approval retained before implementation.
EHR cutover continuity
Deepen order capture, specimen context, reconciliation queues, authorized restoration, and recovery reporting for scoped clinical transitions.
Multi-region recovery
Evaluate failover workflows against agreed recovery objectives, data synchronization, dependencies, and operational ownership.
Partner plug-in infrastructure
Explore infrastructure-as-code generation, hosting patterns, identity integration, and review requirements around specific AI integrations.
A synchronized planning process
Carry architecture assumptions into the continuity review, and bring recovery findings back into the design and implementation handoff.
Make governance part of the next step.
Security design commitments include role-based access, multi-factor authentication, encryption, audit logging, tenant isolation, and synthetic data in non-production. These commitments guide the direction; they do not establish certification or a finding of compliance.
AI assistance and live integration require their own evaluation. A reviewer should know the requirements, supported boundaries, unresolved assumptions, and the owner responsible for accepting a change.
Use the architecture review checklistEvaluate one area with a clear scope.
Start with one project, its architecture decisions, and the work that must continue through change.